LLumen Capital ‹ Deals Harborview Apartments you@example.com

Harborview Apartments

multifamily · mid-rise Missing information

Credit Committee

complete
Run 02 — Final committee approval Jun 16, 2026 · config v3
Convene a new runconfig v3 — Lumen standardEdit committee →
Briefingpacket frozen · 48 facts

The committee convened on a $40.3M acquisition loan against a $62.0M purchase of Harborview Apartments — a 2003-vintage, 118-unit mid-rise in Harbor Bay, Oakland. T12 NOI of $2.86M supports 1.31× base coverage at the blended SOFR forward curve + 275. The sponsor contributes 22% cash equity and has closed twice previously with Lumen.

GapGuarantor liquidity information is incomplete (or does not exist in current records).
GapEnvironmental site assessment does not exist in current records. Committee proceeds with available data.
BSBorrower & Sponsor Diligencecautious on sponsor strength APPROVE W/ CONDITIONS0.74

Fourteen assets under management, nine in the East Bay; KYC and adverse-media screens clear across three sources; two prior facilities with Lumen performed to maturity. The concern is verification, not track record: the guarantor’s personal financial statement is dated September 2025 — stale for a closing package. Guarantor liquidity information is incomplete (or does not exist in current records); approval is conditioned on a refresh dated within 90 days.

22% cash equity — real skin in the game at this basis
Two performing prior facilities with this lender
Guarantor liquidity unverifiable today
PFS stale beyond policy (9+ months)
Guarantor PFS · Sep 2025KYC screen ×3
MIMarket Intelligence APPROVE0.86

Oakland Class-B rents turned positive at +2.1% YoY after eight flat quarters. The comp set averages $2.41/SF against the subject’s in-place $2.28 — a 5.7% mark-to-market the plan doesn’t depend on capturing quickly. Submarket pipeline is 240 units (1.9% of stock), nothing delivering inside 18 months. Lease-up comps still show ~3 weeks of concessions.

RentCast comps · 12Rent roll · May 2026
PCProperty & Collateral APPROVE0.91

The 2025 county assessment carries the property at $48.2M; sale triggers the Prop-13 step-up and taxes are correctly re-underwritten at 1.18% of price — millage verified against the county schedule. No deferred-capex flags on the 2003 build. Handed to the model: insurance renewed +18% YoY, second consecutive double-digit increase — the reserve should be forward, not trailing.

Tax assessment 2025 · p.1Insurance quoteOffering memo
UMUnderwriting Modelrevised in debate APPROVE W/ CONDITIONS0.81

Base NOI of $2.86M ties to the T12 net of a normalized $410/unit insurance reserve. Coverage runs 1.31× base / 1.12× stressed at the selected curve; exit cap 5.75%, committee-adjusted. After the skeptic’s challenge, year-one rent growth was cut from the sponsor’s 3.5% to 3.0% (2.5% thereafter) — DSCR restated 1.34× → 1.31×, inside policy. The rate cap is still priced indicatively; its final economics must be in the workbook before approval is effective.

NOI ties to T12 p.4 with forward insurance reserve
Exit cap 5.75% from Oakland comp set, policy-adjusted
Stress DSCR 1.12× below 1.15 tolerance
Rate cap indicative, not executed → condition 01
T12 · p.4Rate curve · SOFR fwdAppraisal draft · p.12
CRCredit Risk APPROVE W/ CONDITIONS0.79

Leverage (65% vs ≤70% policy) and base coverage (1.31× vs ≥1.25×) clear. The exception is stress: 1.12× against 1.15× tolerance. Not a decline at this quality — but the structure must absorb it: purchased rate cap, quarterly DSCR covenant at 1.20×, cash sweep on breach. Debt yield 8.6% is acceptable for the basis.

MSModel Skepticchallenges unsupported claims ABSTAIN0.55

Three challenges, two resolved before adjournment. What remains is valuation: the cap-rate evidence is a draft appraisal, and a 29% assessed-value buffer is comfort, not evidence. Abstains rather than dissents — the objections to operating assumptions were met by revision.

Debate3 challenges · 2 resolved · 1 openFull transcript →
Model Skeptic Underwriting Model challenge
The sponsor case carries 3.5% year-one rent growth. Your own comps show 2.4% trailing. Produce support the packet does not contain, or cut the number.
Resolved — model revised to 3.0% / 2.5% · DSCR 1.34× → 1.31×, inside policy
Credit Risk Property & Collateral challenge
Insurance is up eighteen percent, and fifteen the year before. Is the reserve trailing or forward?
Resolved — quote-backed $410/unit reserve adopted into NOI normalization
Market Intelligence Underwriting Model support
The revised 3.0% is achievable without pushing face rents — the mark-to-market on turnover does most of the work on its own.
Model Skeptic Committee for the record
The record should show the valuation case is provisional until the appraisal is final.
Open — noted; abstention stands pending final appraisal
Chair synthesis — final recommendationApprove with conditions

Collateral, market, and base-case credit clear policy without strain. The debate did its job — the assumptions reaching the closing memo are the committee’s, not the sponsor’s. Three items separate this record from an unconditional approval; none is a credit objection. All are verification gates, assigned in the docket.

Data limitations: guarantor liquidity information is incomplete (or does not exist in current records); environmental site assessment does not exist in current records. Both gaps are bound into conditions rather than assumptions.

Scenario modelbest / base / downside
Credit metrics by case
Downside DSCR breaches the 1.15× tolerance — bound into condition 01
DSCR × policy 1.25 1.41 1.31 1.12 Best Base Down Debt yield % 9.1 8.6 7.9 Best Base Down LTV % policy 70 63.2 65.0 68.4 Best Base Down
Best / mgmt case Base / committee case Downside Policy breach
Rate curve used by committee
SOFR forward blended with Fed dot-plot downside · FRED + CME proxy
5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 4.00% Today 6M 12M 24M 36M
Selected — committee Fed dot-plot blend Treasury forward
+100 bps
−5.0 %
Overrides convene a new committee run with these assumptions attached to the packet instructions — this record stays immutable.
Assumptions usededits convene a new run
Selected rate curve SOFR forward blended with Fed dot-plot downsideFRED + CME SOFR proxy + Lumen policy override selected Change
Base NOI $2.86MT12 operating statement + normalized insurance reserve evidence backed Override
Exit cap % committee adjusted
Rent growth 3.0% year one, then 2.5%Cut from sponsor 3.5% in debate · RentCast comps committee adjusted Override
Minimum DSCR 1.25× base / 1.15× downside toleranceLumen multifamily credit policy policy
Evidence cited64 citations · 7 documents
DocumentSupportsCited by
T12 Operating Statement p.4NOI $2.86M, normalized reserveUM · PC · CCView →
Property Tax Assessment 2025 p.1Assessed $48.2M · millagePC · UMView →
Rent Roll May 2026In-place $2.28/SF · 118 unitsMI · UMView →
RentCast comp set 12 comps$2.41/SF · trailing growth 2.4%MI · MSView →
Appraisal (draft) p.12Cap-rate comps — provisionalUM · MSView →
Guarantor PFS Sep 2025Liquidity — flagged staleBSView →
Insurance renewal quote$410/unit · +18% YoYPC · UM · CRView →